http://www.candicepayne.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/ Personality Prototype Wed, 16 May 2012 22:58:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.candicepayne.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-717 Candice Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:49:35 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/#comment-717 Oh, I'm sure too. But there isn't any way that I know of that doesn't require effort on my part, so it's irrelevant! Oh, I’m sure too. But there isn’t any way that I know of that doesn’t require effort on my part, so it’s irrelevant!

]]> http://www.candicepayne.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2732 Candice Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:49:00 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/#comment-2732 Oh, I'm sure too. But there isn't any way that I know of that doesn't require effort on my part, so it's irrelevant! Oh, I’m sure too. But there isn’t any way that I know of that doesn’t require effort on my part, so it’s irrelevant!

]]> http://www.candicepayne.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-716 paddy Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:41:02 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/#comment-716 Now I'm just SURE there must be a simpler way to solve this particular problem, rather that relying on the goodwill of the world's spam providers. Is that they are called, I wonder - spam providers? Or maybe spam purveyors... Must look it up. Now I’m just SURE there must be a simpler way to solve this particular problem, rather that relying on the goodwill of the world’s spam providers. Is that they are called, I wonder – spam providers? Or maybe spam purveyors… Must look it up.

]]> http://www.candicepayne.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2731 paddy Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:41:00 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2007/09/03/the-one-good-thing-about-spam/#comment-2731 Now I'm just SURE there must be a simpler way to solve this particular problem, rather that relying on the goodwill of the world's spam providers. Is that they are called, I wonder - spam providers? Or maybe spam purveyors... Must look it up. Now I’m just SURE there must be a simpler way to solve this particular problem, rather that relying on the goodwill of the world’s spam providers. Is that they are called, I wonder – spam providers? Or maybe spam purveyors… Must look it up.

]]>